About Me

My photo
Chuck Baker is Right! Well, I am. What I mean is that my friends always joke that I’m always right (or at least I think I am). The thing is I don’t say anything, unless I know I’m right. So it's not that I’m right about everything, but usually when I speak I know what I’m talking about. My dad always said, “Don’t speak unless you know your right.” This blog includes many subjects like religion, politics, business, movies, sports, and more. On the left you will see options to search this blog, see popular posts, a catalog of posts, and favorite links. Please check out my YouTube channel by clicking on the link under favorite links.

Injustice

1.  Amos Background

Amos was a herdsman in Judah when called by God to preach against the social and economic sins of the Northern Kingdom, Israel.

Amos, was a poor man who cared for sycamore trees, which the fruit was a food of the poor.  He traveled to the worship centers of Israel, to proclaim God’s anger of how the powerful were treating the weak and the things of God.[1]

After the wars with Syria was settled and the military threat ended when Damascus came under the sovereignty of Israel, an economic explosion took place.  Israel now controlled ancient trade routes, and expansion gave rise to a new social class of wealthy merchants. Wealth created a demand for the many luxuries available from all over the world.

Pressured by the influx of wealth, major social changes took place. The population began to shift from farms to cities and towns. Class distinctions became just the very rich and the very poor, with no middle class.   Exorbitant prices were charged; poor farmers were gotten rid of, so that the rich might build up great estates. A heartless unconcern for the sufferings of the oppressed marked the time.[2]

The moral condition of the nation was clearly revealed by the prophet’s shock at the cruel treatment of the poor by the rich, at the covetousness, injustice, and immorality of the people in power, and at the general contempt for things holy (2:6–8). Trampling on the poor, taking exactions of wheat (5:11), afflicting the just, taking a bribe, and turning aside from the needy (v. 23) stirred the anger of Amos and God.

In political circles there was oppression, violence and robbery (3:9–10). People hated any judge who would reprimand them or speak justly (5:10).

Against this background of prosperity and oppression, Amos who knew poverty appeared from Judah. For a few short months, he denounced the sins of Israel and promised judgment.[3]

2.  Amos 2:6-8; For three sins of Israel, even for four, I will not turn back My wrath. They sell the righteous for silver, and the needy for a pair of sandals. They trample on the heads of the poor as upon the dust of the ground and deny justice to the oppressed. Father and son use the same girl and so profane My holy name. They lie down beside every altar on garments taken in pledge. In the house of their god they drink the wine taken as fines.[4]

This verse reveals 5 injustices of this time being done to the poor and to God.

“They sell the righteous.” The rights of the poor were carefully protected in the Old Testament Law, and those rights were regularly being violated.

The first charge against the Israelites is that they callously sold into slavery the poor who could not pay their debts (cf. 2 Kings 4:1-7). Honest people (the righteous) who could be trusted to repay eventually, were sold for the silver they owed. The desperately poor (the needy) were enslaved because they could not pay back the insignificant sum they owed for a pair of sandals (cf. Amos 8:6). These sandals might refer to the custom of giving one’s sandals as a kind of mortgage deed or title to confirm the legal transfer of land (cf. Ruth 4:7). The meaning would then be that the poor were being sold for either money or land. [5]

Remember that while putting yourself into slavery to pay-off a debt was acceptable in the law, selling other Israelites in slavery like commodity was acceptable. 

They trample the heads of the poor  Amos’ second accusation against Israel was that legal procedures were being perverted to exploit the poor. Contrary to the covenant commands, the courts had gone into collusion with the creditors and were denying justice to the oppressed. This oppression was so terrible and painful it was like trampling on their heads.[6]

“A father and his son.” This may be a reference to use of the same temple prostitute or just old fashion orgies. It was a flagrant violation both of God’s command to worship only Him, and a revelation of the gross immorality involved in pagan worship and self worship.

“Garments taken in pledge.” Here Amos returns to his central theme of injustice. The Law demanded that if a poor man’s cloak were taken as a pledge against a loan or debt, it was to be returned to him before night, since the cloak was also his blanket (Deut. 24:12–13). But in Israel, such cloaks were piled around the altars as resting places for wealthy worshipers!

God’s Law placed restrictions on items which could be taken as collateral. Millstones were not to be taken since they were needed for grinding grain and thus were essential to sustaining life. The cloak of a poor man was not to be kept as a pledge overnight; a widow’s garment could not be taken in pledge at all. Yet the people openly and flagrantly were lying down with the forbidden garments, going so far in their contempt for the Law as to spread them at the sacrificial feasts by every altar.[7]

“The wine taken as fines.” Wine that had been extorted as taxes or fines from the poor was used in the very centers (wrongly) set aside to worship God! Thus, even God was made to seem a party to oppression.[8]

The wine they had unjustly extracted from the poor as fines was also being raised in honor to a heathen gods.[9]

3.  Conclusion

God takes very seriously the actions of people who take advantage of others and hurt those who are weak.  Remember the poor in Hebrew times were usually widows that had no family to take care of them.  Many times these widows had lost their sons and husband to war.  This would be like someone taking advantage of a military wife or mother.  Others were the lame or sick.  Leopards, the blind, and those born unable to work were usually the ones in need.  Children were also the ones hurt the hardest as parent were sold into slavery or sometime even themselves sold. 

We should not confuse the poor in America with the truly poor in Israel at this time or the poor in other counties like Haiti, Africa, India, and other such countries.  God expects those that can do for themselves to do for themselves, but for those truly unable to help themselves the responsibility lies on us, the Church.  God doesn’t look to government, but to his people, the Church.

It is our duty to not only help the needy with spiritual food and comfort, but also with physical food, drink, clothes, shelter, and justice. 



[1] Richards, Larry ;   Richards, Lawrence O.: The Teacher's Commentary. Wheaton, Ill. : Victor Books, 1987, S. 461
[2] Richards, Larry ;   Richards, Lawrence O.: The Teacher's Commentary. Wheaton, Ill. : Victor Books, 1987, S. 461
[3] Richards, Larry ;   Richards, Lawrence O.: The Teacher's Commentary. Wheaton, Ill. : Victor Books, 1987, S. 462
[4] Richards, Larry ;   Richards, Lawrence O.: The Teacher's Commentary. Wheaton, Ill. : Victor Books, 1987, S. 463
[5] Walvoord, John F. ;  Zuck, Roy B. ;   Dallas Theological Seminary: The Bible Knowledge Commentary : An Exposition of the Scriptures. Wheaton, IL : Victor Books, 1983-c1985, S. 1:1431
[6] Walvoord, John F. ;  Zuck, Roy B. ;   Dallas Theological Seminary: The Bible Knowledge Commentary : An Exposition of the Scriptures. Wheaton, IL : Victor Books, 1983-c1985, S. 1:1431
[7] Walvoord, John F. ;  Zuck, Roy B. ;   Dallas Theological Seminary: The Bible Knowledge Commentary : An Exposition of the Scriptures. Wheaton, IL : Victor Books, 1983-c1985, S. 1:1431
[8] Richards, Larry ;   Richards, Lawrence O.: The Teacher's Commentary. Wheaton, Ill. : Victor Books, 1987, S. 463
[9] Walvoord, John F. ;  Zuck, Roy B. ;   Dallas Theological Seminary: The Bible Knowledge Commentary : An Exposition of the Scriptures. Wheaton, IL : Victor Books, 1983-c1985, S. 1:1431